621 So. 2d 693 - Hallberg v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Tibbs v. Florida · 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State · 506 So. 2d 1039 - In re Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 6C(1) · 591 So. 2d 178 - Florida Bar re Corbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“duty or obligation to care for the other,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Hallberg v. State · Hull v. State“The uncontradicted evidence shows that at the time of the offenses, S.S. had just concluded her eighth grade year during which appellant was her teacher and her advisor. Her father referred to appellant twice in his testimony as S.S.'s "mentor." S.S. was scheduled to have appellant as her history teacher again in the ninth grade. Appellant had arranged to have S.S. work with him and for him during the summer recess in preparation for the ninth grade Alpha history class. He had taken material for that preparation to her home. He was in her home alone with her on the day of the alleged offenses ostensibly to check on her progress in the preparation for the next school year.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hallberg v. State“Sometime in May he [appellant] approached me and told me he couldn't go the entire summer without seeing me, and I was going to have him again the next year because he was going to be teaching Alpha history and he had never taught that class before. And he told me that since I'd been in Alpha he wanted me to help prepare help him prepare for the class.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hallberg v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.