621 So. 2d 752 - State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Andrijevic v. Kelleran · Mitan v. United States · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a nonfinal order does not involve one of the subjects enumerated in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1), the state would not be able to correct an erroneous and highly prejudicial ruling. Under such circumstances, the state could only proceed to trial with its ability to present the case significantly impaired.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Evidence of collateral crimes may be admissible to establish the entire context out of which the alleged criminal conduct arose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“suppressing before trial confessions, admissions, or evidence obtained by search and seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richardson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.