Speigner v. Speigner’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chisholm v. Chisholm · Phillips v. Phillips · 413 So. 2d 412 - Gillman v. Gillman · Eckel v. Eckel · Brawner v. Pixie Development Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“61.021 Residence requirements. ___ To obtain a dissolution of marriage, one of the parties to the marriage must reside 6 months in the state before the filing of the petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Compliance with the section 61.021 residence requirement has long been held to be jurisdictional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.