Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 SW2D 120 - State v. Parker

State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2002

4 state decisions

20198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Franklin · State v. Hoyt · Hayes v. State · State v. Garner · Boothe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 545.030, RSMo 1978 provides: 1. No indictment or information shall be deemed invalid.... 5. For omitting to state the time at which the offense was committed, in any case where time is not of the essence of the offense; nor 6. For stating the time imperfectly; nor 7. For stating the offense to have been committed on a day subsequent to the finding of the indictment or information, or an impossible day, or on a day that never happened; nor 18. For any other defect or imperfection which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant upon the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.