Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 SW2D 123 - Potter v. Potter

Potter v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2008

11 state decisions

60198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilhoit v. Wilhoit · Turpin v. Turpin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The provision means, simply, that spouses may settle their property rights between them by agreement rather than by the method of judicial division under § 452.330 — but if they do, the expression of that assent must be written. The rationale is to avoid dispute and manifests once again a transcendent purpose of the Dissolution of Marriage Act to avoid litigation beyond the dissolution proceeding, itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.