Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 SW2D 606 - Rushing v. State

Rushing v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1983
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Earl v. State · Evans v. State · Johnson v. State · West v. State · Thompson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““did then and there unlawfully, while in the course of committing theft of property owned by PAULA CAGLE, hereafter styled the Complainant, and with intent to obtain and maintain control of the property, intentionally and knowingly threaten and place the Complainant in fear of imminent bodily injury and death, by using and exhibiting a deadly weapon, namely, a knife.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “neither charge required the jury to find that the robbery occurred while in the course of committing theft. In the case at bar, however, the charge properly defined”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.