Pete v. Cumberland County’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz · Allen v. Regents of University System of Georgia · United States v. Porth · State Corp. Commission v. Federal Power Commission · Monamotor Oil Co. v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That no man’s particular services shall be demanded, or property taken, or applied to public use, without the consent of his representatives or without just compensation being made therefor.” Tenn. Const, art. I, § 21.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huskey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.