Coleman v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1983
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 53 Tenn. App. 594 - Crouch v. Crouch · 39 Tenn. App. 99 - Humphreys v. Humphreys · Winslow v. Winslow · Acree v. Acree · Riley v. Riley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the rationale in Coleman we affirm the award of alimony and [$150] attorneys’ fees pendente lite because such award became final prior to a determination that the husband was entitled to the divorce. That award was not appealed. This court is without the authority to award the wife any additional monies because the husband prevailed on the merits [emphasis added].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fox v. Fox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.