Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 SW2D 752 - Coleman v. Coleman

Coleman v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1983
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 53 Tenn. App. 594 - Crouch v. Crouch · 39 Tenn. App. 99 - Humphreys v. Humphreys · Winslow v. Winslow · Acree v. Acree · Riley v. Riley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the rationale in Coleman we affirm the award of alimony and [$150] attorneys’ fees pendente lite because such award became final prior to a determination that the husband was entitled to the divorce. That award was not appealed. This court is without the authority to award the wife any additional monies because the husband prevailed on the merits [emphasis added].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.