Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 S.W.2d 835 - Roberts v. Roberts

Roberts v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2006

8 state decisions

60198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc. · Stoner v. Thompson · Ivy v. Carrell · Murff v. Murff · Cockerham v. Cockerham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... there was no evidence of the relative values of the properties awarded to the parties, and no evidence of the circumstances of the parties, upon which the division made might be justified. Since there was no evidence to support the determination that the division made was just and right, we hold the court abused its discretion in the matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.