State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2018
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco · State v. Arnold · State v. Drake
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To be entitled to dismissal of an information for preindictment delay a defendant must show two things: (1) that the prein-dictment delay caused substantial prejudice to his right to a fair trial, and (2) ‘that the delay was an intentional device to gain tactical advantage over the accused.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Waselewski“the record shows that the motion was considered and acted upon, and that counsel for [the defendant] was present at the time and place and remained silent[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson“requested an evidentiary hearing or an opportunity to present oral argument on the motion for new trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.