Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 A.2d 723 - State v. Abbott

State v. Abbott’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Barry · State v. Mishne · State v. Burnham · State v. Condon · State v. Rainey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an addict in [the defendant’s] state suffers from a “compulsion” to obtain drugs. Existence of a compulsion, or a compelling need, does not tend to negate a conscious purpose to cause certain results. Nor does evidence of a compelling need tend to show that a defendant lacked conscious awareness of the attendant circumstances of his actions. In fact, evidence of a compelling need tends to confirm, the conclusion that defendant acted with awareness and with the conscious object of fulfilling that need.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.