Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 F.2d 120 - Gordon v. Watson

Gordon v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

622 F.2d 120 · 1980

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Hall v. Bellmon (1991), United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property in Greene & Tuscaloosa Counties (1991)

36 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

4101980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Fowler v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Jones v. Menard · Rufus F. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Summary judgment is an excellent device by which [trial] courts may make expedited dispositions of those cases in which a trial would be fruitless. When summary judgment is inappropriate because the supporting or opposing materials are improper, the [trial] court has ample discretion to call upon the parties to remedy the defects by submitting supplemental affidavits or otherwise."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] verified pleading may itself be treated as an affidavit in support of a motion for summary judgment, but only if it satisfies the standards for affidavits set out in Rule 56[ (c)(4)].”). . Although Bentley purportedly seeks summary judgment on its”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.