Payne v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
622 F.2d 254 · 1980
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 1990
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · United States Smith v. Baldi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Nor can we find a federal constitutional violation in the state trial court’s refusal to provide expert witness and psychiatric examination by witness of his (defendant’s) own choosing. See U. S. ex rel Smith v. Baldi, 344 U.S. 561 , 73 S.Ct. 391 , 97 L.Ed. 549 (1953).” 622 F.2d at 255 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lackey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.