United States v. Jimenez’s Empirical Analysis
622 F.2d 753 · 1980
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably United States v. Phillips (1981), United States v. Read (1981)
26 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · United States v. Richardson · United States v. Wentland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“affirmative acts inconsistent with the object of the conspiracy and communicated in a manner reasonably calculated to reach other conspirators.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... conspirator must show that he acted affirmatively to defeat or disavow the purpose of the conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.