Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 F.2d 8 - Brooks v. A. R. & S. Enterprises, Inc.

Brooks v. A. R. & S. Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

622 F.2d 8 · 1980

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
November 2012
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 13 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Lawrence v. Dunbar (1990), Williams v. United States (1995)

21 federal appellate · 13 district ·

1701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McAllister v. United States · Cree v. Goldstein · United States v. Orleans · United States v. Muniz · In Re Disbarment of Isserman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “employee of the government includes officers or employees of any federal agency, members of the military or naval forces of the United States ... and persons acting on behalf of a federal agency in an official capacity, temporary or permanently in the service of the United States, whether with or without compensation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “as in Logue and Maryland , the question here is not whether the community action agency receives federal money and must comply with federal standards and regulations, but whether its day-to-day operations are supervised by the Federal Government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The right to inspect does not nullify the general rule that the government is not liable for torts of independent contractors.”); cf. Varig Airlines, 467 U.S. at 819-20 , 104 S.Ct. 2755 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.