Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 F.2d 972 - Blue Cross Association, and American Hospital Association, Intervenor-Appellee v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, Leonard Schaeffer, Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration, Missouri Hospital Association, a Pro Forma Decree Corporation, Kansas City Area Hospital Association, a Corporation, Hospital Association of Metropolitan St. Louis, a Corporation, Kansas Hospital Association, a Corporation, and American Hospital Association, Intervenor-Appellee v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Leonard D. Schaeffer, Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration

Blue Cross Association, and American Hospital Association, Intervenor-Appellee v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, Leonard Schaeffer, Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration, Missouri Hospital Association, a Pro Forma Decree Corporation, Kansas City Area Hospital Association, a Corporation, Hospital Association of Metropolitan St. Louis, a Corporation, Kansas Hospital Association, a Corporation, and American Hospital Association, Intervenor-Appellee v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Leonard D. Schaeffer, Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2006

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

70198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Udall v. Tallman · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington · Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No experiment or demonstration project shall be engaged in or developed under Section (a) of this section until the secretary obtains the advice and recommendations of specialists who are competent to evaluate the proposed experiment or demonstration project as to the soundness of its objectives, the possibilities of securing productive results, the adequacy of resources to conduct a proposed experiment or demonstration project, and its relationship to other similar experiments and projects already completed or in process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When faced with a problem of statutory construction, this Court shows great deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration. “To sustain the Commission’s application of this statutory term, we need not find that its construction is the only reasonable one, or even that it is the result we would have reached had the question arisen in the first instance in judicial proceedings.” * * “Particularly is this respect due when the administrative practice at stake ‘involves a contemporaneous construction of a statute by the men charged with the responsibility of setting its machinery in motion, of making the parts work efficiently and smoothly while they are yet untried and new.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a)(1) The Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare is authorized, either directly or through grants to public or nonprofit private agencies, institutions, and organizations or contracts with public or private agencies, institutions, and organizations, to develop and engage in experiments and demonstration projects for the following purposes: 11”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.