United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
622 F.3d 1 · 2010
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 963
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Booker · Carroll v. United States · Ornelas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A Terry stop requires only a “minimal level of objective justification.” ... An officer may initiate a Terry stop based not on certainty but on the need “to ‘check out’ a reasonable suspicion.” Moreover, whether reasonable suspicion exists depends on the totality of circumstances as “ ‘viewed through the eyes of a reasonable and cautious police officer on the scene, guided by his experience and training.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“give due weight to inferences drawn from ... facts by the district court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.