Bokhari v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
622 F.3d 357 · 2010
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Singh v. Gonzales · United States v. Flores · Thuy-Xuan Mai v. Gonzales · 579 F. Supp. 2d 249 - El Badrawi v. Department of Homeland Security
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“interpretation and application of the relevant regulations and statutes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“constitutional claims or questions of law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.