Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 N.E.2d 172 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2013

6 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spradlin v. State · 54 Ind. App. 381 - Ashwell v. Miller · Golden v. State · Barnett v. State · Mayes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “with pen and ink or any other specific instrument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Coates v. State · Heather Herren v. Jerry Dishman
  2. “his objection and asked the court to reconsider admission of Exhibit 1 on the basis that the general certification by Holmes and DCM was improper. We agree with the State that Coates' contention that the certification was improper has been waived because he failed to make a timely objection on that ground prior to the trial court's admission of Exhibit 1. Notwithstanding waiver, Coates' assertion has no merit. It is well-settled that the validity of a signature to a certification statement does not depend on it being executed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Coates v. State
  3. “'[A] signing or subscribing may legally be done by another for the party to such an instrument, if done at his request, and ... it may be done with pen and ink, pencil, stamp, stencil, typewriter or type. ...'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Coates v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.