Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 NE2D 457 - Tyson v. State

Tyson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Saylor v. State (2002), People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Bobby Berosini, Ltd. (1995)

30 state decisions

130199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vermont v. Cox · Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie · Hanil Bank v. Michelman · Griffin v. United States · California v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'an objective person, knowledgeable of all the cireumstances, would have a reasonable basis for doubting the judge's impartiality.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[cloncerns about public confidence in the judicial system”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Indiana practice has always leaned toward recusal where reasonable questions about impartiality exist. In fact, Indiana departed from the ABA model code by omitting provisions for the remittal of disqualification, former Canon 3(D), believing that parties should not be permitted to waive grounds for recusal which the public might find warranted.... [I]n a close case where impartiality might reasonably be questioned, a judge must recuse.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.