Farrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited
1 district · 17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stovall v. Denno · Hutton v. United States · Dillard v. State · Morris v. State · James v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not stand out so strikingly in his characteristics that he virtually is alone with respect to identifying features.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.Y. v. State · JY v. State“the pre-trial identification procedure was so unduly suggestive that it tainted the victim's in-court identification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.Y. v. State · JY v. State“a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.Y. v. State · JY v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.