Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 NE2D 954 - Price v. State

Price v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
5
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Richardson v. State (1999), Games v. State (1997)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 104 state decisions

540199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Kolender v. Lawson · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. Such a conclusion fails to recognize, however, that in Indiana the police power is limited by the existence of certain preserves of human endeavor, typically denominated as interests not”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “No law shall be passed, restraining the free interchange of thought and opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print, freely, on any subject whatever: but for the abuse of that right, every person shall be responsible.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[if the right, as impaired, would no longer serve the purpose for which it was designed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.