Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 NW2D 290 - State v. DeCamp

State v. DeCamp’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Monge v. California · Gryger v. Burke · Monge v. California · State v. Pace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ineffective assistance of counsel claims presented on direct appeal are typically preserved for [postconviction-relief] proceedings to allow for a full development of the facts surrounding the conduct of counsel.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The effective date of the enhanced sentencing provisions gives the offender notice his future acts will be subject to enhanced punishment based on the prior convictions.”). However, as noted above, we decline to address whether there may be limits to IDOC's discretion where prior history does not demonstrate”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.