Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 N.W.2d 564 - In Re Robb

In Re Robb’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State of Minnesota Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey County Minn · Uselman v. Uselman · State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court · Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. · In Re Blodgett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “who have engaged in a prior course of sexually harmful behavior and whose present disorder or dysfunction does not allow them to adequately control their sexual impulses, making it highly likely that they will engage in harmful sexual acts in the future.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.