Buchanan v. Parsons’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2000
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Biklen v. Board of Education · Griffin v. Dohner · Draughon v. Wright · Washington & Lee University v. District Court of Oklahoma County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is interested under 58 0.8.1971, § 29 if the will interferes with a direct pecuniary interest that would have arisen under the intestacy laws but for the purported will.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.