Brown v. Peterson Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strom v. Felton · 14 Utah 2d 135 - King v. Fronk · 15 Utah 2d 156 - Fuoco v. Williams · Brown v. Milliner · 7 Utah 2d 237 - Motzkus v. Carroll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had acquired title to the disputed strip of land by operation of law under the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Q-2 L.L.C. v. Hughes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.