Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 P2D 1349 - Barnette v. Doyle

Barnette v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
12
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 42 Cal. 3d 490 - Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn. (1986), Boren v. Sable (1989)

4 federal appellate · 62 state decisions — followed in 12 states

47019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 676

Relies on Michel v. United States · Brady v. Southern Railway Co. · Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad · Michigan Central Railroad v. Vreeland · Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. Addie Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rights and remedies provided in this act [§§ 27-12-101 through 27-12-804] for an employee and his dependents for injuries incurred in extrahazardous employments are in lieu of all other rights and remedies against any employer making contributions required by this act, or his employees acting within the scope of their employment unless the employees are culpably negligent * * *.” (Emphasis added.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]n agent who, by promise or otherwise, undertakes to act for his principal under such circumstances that some action is necessary for the protection of the person or tangible things of another, is subject to liability to the other for physical harm to him or to his things caused by the reliance of the principal or of the other upon his undertaking and his subsequent unexcused failure to act, if such failure creates an unreasonable risk of harm to him and the agent should so realize.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Worker's compensation laws were enacted during the later [sic] part of the nineteenth century in order to provide social insurance for victims of industrial accidents, and this compensation is not based upon fault or the breach of a duty owed by the employer to the injured employee. These laws were not enacted to abrogate existing common-law remedies that protected injured workers. * * *"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.