Dorman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 104 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 107 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin (1983), Tibbs v. Florida (1982)
2 federal appellate · 104 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · Doyle v. Ohio · Holland v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“consider[s]) only those facts in the record most favorable to the prosecution and such reasonable inferences as a jury may have drawn from them.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“adequate to support a conclusion by a reasonable mind that there was no reasonable doubt as to [the defendant's] guilt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jeffries v. State · Shayen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.