¶1Appellant challenges his sentences for robbery without a gun, aggravated assault and grand theft. We affirm appellant’s sentences as a habitual offender based on *1033King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 602 So.2d 942 (Fla.1992). We do remand, however, for appellant’s sentence to be amended to reflect proper credit for time served as required by Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941, (Fla.1993).
622 So. 2d 1032
Kilpatrick v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 21, 1993
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-07-21
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1996
1 state decisions
Relies on 622 So. 2d 941 - Tripp v. State · 602 So. 2d 914 - Florida Bar re: Advisory Opinion · 597 So. 2d 309 - King v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-07-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →