Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

622 So. 2d 1176

Hamlin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 3, 1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-09-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1994

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-09-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Steven B. Hamlin appeals from the summary denial of his postconviction relief motion and motion to amend and supplement defendant’s pending motion for postconviction relief. In reviewing the trial court’s order, we note that specific references are made to the transcript of the plea colloquy dated August 24, 1990, and the transcript of sentencing dated September 28, 1990. The trial court has failéd to attach copies of the relevant pages of the designated transcripts in support of its order.

¶2Without ruling on the merits of the subject appeal, we remand this matter to the trial court to attach those portions of the record which support its order denying Hamlin’s motion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/622/so2d/1176 · .json · Public domain