Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 So. 2d 1239 - Muhammad v. Muhammad

622 So. 2d 1239 - Muhammad v. Muhammad’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018 · most notably 722 So. 2d 547 - Selman v. Selman (1998), 761 So. 2d 851 - Chatman v. State (2000)

24 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Sherbert v. Verner · Torcaso v. Watkins · Fowler v. Rhode Island · 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Trial judges are vested with considerable discretion in ruling on motions for new trial, and it has been noted on numerous occasions that `[t]his Court will reverse a trial judge's denial of request for new trial only when such denial amounts to a [sic] abuse of that judge's discretion.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Automatic reversal is not required where the appellee fails to file a brief, but reversal is appropriate if the appellant's argument creates doubt in the judiciousness of the trial court's judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “child custody is at issue, the Court is compelled to review the record, despite [Doughty's] failure to file a brief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.