622 So. 2d 435 - Senf v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2016
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Kolender v. Lawson · Parker v. Levy · Smith v. Goguen · Lanzetta v. State New Jersey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must demonstrate that the statute under attack is vague as applied to his own conduct , regardless of the potentially vague applications to others.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. State · Dill v. State“Due process requires that all `be informed as to what the State commands or forbids,' Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451, 453 , 59 S.Ct. 618, 619 , 83 L.Ed. 888 (1939), and that `men of common intelligence' not be forced to guess at the meaning of the criminal law. Connally v. General Constructions Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 , 46 S.Ct. 126, 127 , 70 L.Ed. 322 (1926).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“be informed as to what the State commands or forbids,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. State · State v. Woodard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.