State v. Agee’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
79 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Dorian v. State (1994), Genden v. Fuller (1994)
79 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wood v. State · 502 So. 2d 422 - Bloom v. McKnight · 506 So. 2d 1035 - Zabrani v. Cowart · 588 So. 2d 600 - State v. Agee · 619 So. 2d 311 - State v. Dorian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the speedy trial time begins to run when an accused is first taken into custody and continues to run when the State voluntarily terminates prosecution before formal charges are filed and the State may not file charges based on the same conduct after the speedy trial period has expired.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage“( o ) Nolle Prosequi; Effect. The intent and effect of this rule shall not be avoided by the state by entering a nolle prosequi to a crime charged and by prosecuting a new crime grounded on the same conduct or criminal episode or otherwise by prosecuting new and different charges based on the same conduct or criminal episode, whether or not the pending charge is suspended, continued, or is the subject of entry of a nolle prosequi.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“Florida’s speedy trial rule is contained in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 and requires the State to bring a defendant to trial within a time certain: (a)(1) Speedy Trial Without Demand. Except as otherwise provided by this Rule, and subject to the limitations imposed under (b)(1) and (b)(2), every person charged with a crime by indictment or information shall be brought to trial ... within 175 days if the crime charged is a felony ... The time periods established by this section shall commence when such person is taken into custody [[Image here]] ‡ ⅜ ⅜ # ⅜ ⅜ Based on the foregoing, we hold that when the State enters a nol pros, the speedy trial period continues to run and the State may not refile charges based on the same conduct after the period has expired. (Footnote omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Genden v. Fuller · Mercer v. Musleh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.