Albritton v. Albritton’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2019
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 408 So. 2d 888 - Matter of Succession of Dunham · Succession of Noe · Albritton v. Albritton · Succession of Noe · 94 So. 2d 589 - Powell v. Cocowitch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statutory provisions relative to the responsibilities of a trustee are rigid and hold the trustee to an even higher fiduciary responsibility to his beneficiary than that owed by a succession representative to heirs. The very word “trustee” implies the strongest obligation on the part of the trustee to be chaste in all dealings with the beneficiary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“provision in the trust instrument is not effective to relieve the trustee from liability for breach of the duty of loyalty to a beneficiary....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“implies the strongest obligation on the part of the trustee to be chaste in all dealings with the beneficiary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Harrier Trust
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.