Rogers v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 397 So. 2d 775 - Nationwide Mut. Ins. v. Ed Soules Const. Co. · 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer · 590 So. 2d 956 - DeLoach v. DeLoach · 389 So. 2d 1187 - Cowan v. Cowan · 576 So. 2d 852 - Wolff v. Wolff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because one-half of Mr. Rogers's pension will be distributed as marital property, the wife's percentage of the pension may not be considered as a source of payment of alimony after the husband retires and begins collecting his benefits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lauro v. Lauro · Rogers v. Rogers“We hold that the trial court should have reduced the pension benefits to present value and awarded Mrs. Rogers a lump sum.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.