Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 SW2D 1 - Orphant v. Orphan

Orphant v. Orphan’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1995
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on E. O. Dorsch Electric Co. v. Plaza Construction Co. · North v. Hawkinson · Clarke v. Organ · Strumberg v. Mercantile Trust Company · Nicholls v. Lowther

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of the nonclaim statute is to terminate all claims and promote settlement of estates, a matter of public interest. In re Estate of Bierman, 410 S.W.2d 342, 346 [3] (Mo.App.1966). The statute enacted in 1955 (patterned in part after the Model Probate Code § 135) was considerably more far-reaching than former nonclaim statutes. Clarke v. Organ, 329 S.W.2d 670, 673 [1] (Mo. banc 1959). It required notice of contingent as well as absolute claims, omitted the saving provision for infants, prisoners and persons of unsound mind, and defined a mandatory, non-waivable procedure for the orderly processing of all claims against an estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “1. Except as provided in sec. 473.370 [pertaining to judgment creditors], all claims against the estate of a deceased person, other than costs and expenses of administration, ... claims of the United States and claims of any taxing author ity within the United States, ... which are not filed ... or paid ... within six months after the first published notice of letters testamentary or of administration, are forever barred against the estate. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.