Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 SW2D 21 - State v. Mays

State v. Mays’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alonzo Bailey v. State of Alabama · State v. Brinkley · Samuel Kelly Citizen of New York v. James Jackson a Citizen of New Jersey · State v. Cook · State v. Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]efendant having neither challenged nor rebutted the evidence of the [previous] conviction, that evidence overcame [the] presumption of innocence as to that essential element of the case and it sufficiently established the ... previous convictions to support the judgment under [section] 558.016”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Equally well-established, however, is the rule that identity of names makes a prima facie showing that the person named in a record is in fact the defendant for the purpose of invoking habitual criminal acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Reliance upon prima facie evidence does not violate the constitutional requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.