Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 SW2D 300 - State v. Dizdar

State v. Dizdar’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Ayers · State v. Lue · State v. Taylor · State v. Cobb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The facts constituting the newly discovered evidence have come to the mov-ant’s knowledge after the end of the trial; 2. Movant’s lack of prior knowledge is not owing to any want of due diligence on his part; 3. The evidence is so material that it is likely to produce a different result at a new trial; and 4. The evidence is neither cumulative nor merely of an impeaching nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.