Ex Parte Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2000
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burrell v. State · Cohen v. State · Collins v. State · Ex parte Maryland · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1) a person 2) with intent to obtain property or services fraudulently 3) presents or uses 4) a credit card 5) with knowledge that it has not been issued to him and 6) with knowledge that it is not used with the effective consent of the cardholder.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ortega v. State“(1) a person; (2) with intent to fraudulently obtain; (3) property or service; (4) presents or uses; (5) credit card; (6) with knowledge that it is not used with effective consent of cardholder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.