Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 A2D 1265 - State v. Phillipo

State v. Phillipo’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2014

11 state decisions

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. True · Commonwealth v. Reid · State v. Fredette · State v. Calor · State v. Zinck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “D. Statements Which Are Not Hearsay.... A prior consistent statement by the declarant whether or not under oath, is admissible only to rebut an express or implied charge against him of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.