Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 A2D 571 - Jackson v. United States

Jackson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Griffin v. California · Cuyler v. Sullivan · United States v. Lane · Padilla-Martinez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where offenses are considered to constitute a series of ■ acts or transactions because they are part of a common scheme or plan, it is also necessary that there be a substantial overlap in ' proof the various crimes such that it would be difficult to separate proof of one from the other.”). While evidence of overlap is important, we think it is more important to decide whether the indictment actually”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “are based on the same act or transaction or series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he incidents occurred at different stores on different dates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.