Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 F.2d 1107 - United States v. Forrest

United States v. Forrest’s Empirical Analysis

623 F.2d 1107 · 1980

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
3
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Harrelson (1985), United States v. Montes-Cardenas (1984)

44 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

3801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1621

Relies on Houltin v. United States · Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · Giordano v. United States · Tillman v. United States · Rust v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or report, or willfully overvalues any land, property or security, for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of ... a Federal Savings and Loan Association ... upon any application, advance, discount, purchase, purchase agreement, repurchase agreement, commitment, or loan ... shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If it appears that a defendant or the government is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses or of defendants in an indictment or information or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order an election or separate trials of counts, grant a severance of defendants or provide whatever other relief justice requires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the offenses ... are of the same or similar character or are based on the same act or transaction or on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.