Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 F.2d 145 - United States v. Morris

United States v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

623 F.2d 145 · 1980

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
3
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Record (1989), United States v. Dickey (1984)

55 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

3601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Berger v. United States · United States v. Nixon · Swain v. State of Alabama · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First, whether the proliferation of separate crimes or conspiracies presented in the case impaired the jury’s ability to segregate each individual [conspirator's] actions and the evidence associated with [her or] his participation; Second, whether confusion among members of the jury concerning the legal limitations on the use of certain evidence resulted from the variance; and, Third, the strength or weakness of the evidence underlying the jury’s conviction.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'transference of guilt to an accused from incriminating evidence presented in connection with the prosecution of another in the same trial for a crime in which the accused did not participate.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “affects the substantial rights of the accused.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.