Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 F.2d 77 - Cannery Warehousemen, Food Processors, Drivers & Helpers for Teamsters Local Union # 748 v. Haig Berberian, Inc.

Cannery Warehousemen, Food Processors, Drivers & Helpers for Teamsters Local Union # 748 v. Haig Berberian, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

623 F.2d 77 · 1980

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Central Valley Typographical Union, No. 46 v. McClatchy Newspapers (1985), Carpenters' Local Union No. 1478 v. Stevens (1984)

22 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Leedom v. Kyne · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · Ohio v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘absence of jurisdiction of the federal courts’ would mean a ‘sacrifice or obliteration of a right which Congress’ has given ...” and that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “thereby causing the Board to rule that the employer [has] committed an unfair labor proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[V]alid Board representation decisions take precedence over conflicting arbitration decisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.