Dodd v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'no independent significance for fourth amendment purposes.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 387 Wis. 2d 744 - State v. Jessica M. Randall · 321 Mich. App. 377 - People of Michigan v. Glorianna Woodard

2. ““The Court in Schmerber held that probable cause to believe an arrested driver was intoxicated, together with the likelihood that delay in taking blood from the driver would result in the loss of evidence as alcohol dissipated, justified not only the drawing of blood, but also the introduction of the subsequent ‘chemical analysis’ into evidence.” Dodd v. Jones, 623 F.3d 563, 569 (8th Cir. 2010) (citing Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 766-67 ).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Meitler

3. “conflicting” and that the number of bystanders may have increased only after the officers’ use of force against Johnson. Ante at 826. Even construing the record in the light most favorable to Johnson, however, those facts are sufficient to establish the potential for escalating crowd resistance when Johnson initially intervened. McClennon testified that just before Johnson first bear-hugged him,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Johnson v. Carroll