Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 F.3d 599 - Moore v. Astrue

Moore v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

623 F.3d 599 · 2010

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Goff v. Barnhart · Robert J. Lauer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Page v. Astrue · Whitehouse v. Sullivan · Cox v. Astrue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantial evidence supports the ALJ's phrasing of the hypothetical to the vocational expert, and there was no conflict between the vocational expert's testimony and the DOT, the ALJ properly relied on the testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'to simple one- or two-step instructions' or otherwise indicate that Moore could perform only occupations at a [Dictionary] Level 1 reasoning level.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “properly assume that the expert framed his answers based on the factors the ALJ told him to take into account.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.