Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 FSUPP 1300 - McCoy v. Richards

McCoy v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Texaco, Inc. v. Short · Tutun v. United States · Short v. Texaco, Inc. · Kirby v. Ashland Oil, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Indiana Code section 32-5-11-6 provides that, ‘any person who will succeed to the ownership of a mineral interest, upon the lapse thereof, may give notice of the lapse ... (emphasis added).’ As recognized by both Supreme Courts that section makes provision for, but does not require, that notice of the lapse be given to the interest owner. Nothing in the statute requires the party to whom the interest will revert to take any other action to effectuate the lapse.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.