623 F. Supp. 2d 1247 - Bullock v. Wayne’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Hanna v. Plumer · Allen v. Muskogee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“§ 42-4-1713 was designed to protect drivers from the preclusive effect that evidence of a traffic conviction may have in subsequent civil litigation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leaf v. Beihoffer“no record of the. convietion of any person for any violation of this article shall be admissible as evidence in any court in any civil action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leaf v. Beihoffer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.