Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 P.2d 741 - Hatheway v. State

Hatheway v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2021

19 state decisions

8019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barber v. State Highway Commission · Hampton v. State · State v. Lindsay · Lo Sasso v. Braun · Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of Control

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) Other crimes, wrongs, or acts. — Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. ““When the indictment charges an offense against the property of another by larceny, embezzlement or obtaining under false pretenses, the jury, on conviction, shall ascertain and declare in their verdict the value of the property stolen, embezzled or falsely obtained.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. ““ * * * that § 7-11-502, W.S.1977, has no application to those offenses defined by statute subsequent to 1869 unless the grade of the offense depends upon value or unless the available punishment includes an order for restitution. Buckles v. State, supra.” 623 P.2d at 745 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.