Commonwealth v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
58 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3591 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Ring v. Arizona · Greer v. Miller · Commonwealth v. Stoltzfus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing whether the evidence was sufficient to support a [ ] conviction or convictions, the entire trial record must be evaluated and all evidence considered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is the fact-finder's province to weigh the evidence, determine the credibility of witnesses, and believe all, part, or none of the evidence submitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was in response to, and was commensurate with”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Austin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.